Operational technology (OT) data is rapidly becoming the foundation for digital transformation in industrial enterprises. Service providers, SaaS vendors, and analytics partners all depend on access to plant and machine data to deliver efficiency, reliability, and sustainability gains.
But how enterprises choose to share OT data matters. Traditional approaches, such as custom point-to-point pipelines or vendor-hosted portals, introduce escalating costs, governance blind spots, and loss of control.
This whitepaper outlines three primary approaches for OT data sharing:
We compare the benefits and drawbacks of each approach and demonstrate why convergent enterprise data lakes provide the most scalable and future-proof strategy.
Overview
Ad-hoc integrations rely on point-to-point data transfers: custom-built APIs, FTP drops, or one-off pipelines created for specific partners.
Advantages
Drawbacks
Fit for Purpose
Ad-hoc integrations may work in the early stages of digital transformation or for isolated projects. However, they become unmanageable as the number of partners and use cases grows.
Overview
A newer model uses vendor-hosted data-sharing platforms, such as Cognite or Aveva Data Hub, to aggregate OT data and provide access to third parties.
Advantages
Drawbacks
Fit for Purpose
Best for organizations that value short-term outsourcing of complexity, but it undermines long-term independence and convergence goals.
Overview
The most strategic model integrates OT data into the enterprise data lake alongside IT data. Modern platforms like Databricks Delta Sharing and Snowflake Secure Data Sharing then enable governed collaboration without moving or duplicating data.
Advantages
Drawbacks
Fit for Purpose
Enterprises seeking long-term scalability, flexibility, and advanced analytics will find this model the most sustainable and future-ready.
The DeepIQ Advantage
DeepIQ Data Studio makes IT-OT convergent data lakes practical and scalable by:
By addressing integration complexity head-on, DeepIQ empowers enterprises to adopt the convergent data lake model with confidence.
| Criteria | Ad-Hoc Integrations | Vendor-Hosted Platforms | IT-OT Convergent Data Lakes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Speed to Deploy | Fast for single use case | Medium (depends on vendor setup) | Medium (requires setup of lake + software) |
| Cost Over Time | Escalates linearly with partners | High (usage & licensing fees) | Lower (no vendor lock-in; scalable) |
| Data Ownership | Enterprise retains partial control | Vendor owns/hosts data | Enterprise retains full control |
| Scalability | Poor (brittle, point-to-point) | Moderate (limited to vendor ecosystem) | High (supports multiple partners securely) |
| Governance & Security | Weak and fragmented | Vendor-controlled | Enterprise-controlled, end-to-end |
| Integration with IT Data | Difficult; siloed | Limited; creates new silos | Native convergence with IT systems |
| Risk of Vendor Lock-In | Low | High | Low |
| Best For | One-off projects, early pilots | Short-term outsourcing of complexity | Long-term, strategic OT-IT integration |
Enterprises face a strategic choice in how they share OT data:
DeepIQ Data Studio enables organizations to confidently adopt the convergent model, retaining control of their data while unlocking greater value from IT-OT integration.
To learn more about DeepIQ, explore our Customer success stories or engage with us through a focused pilot to experience the platform’s capabilities firsthand. Contact us at info@deepiq.com to begin your transformation journey.